The New Indian Nuclear Posture and Regional Stability in South Asia

Indian Nuclear Posture, Indian No First Use policy

By Dr. Shahid Hameed

India’s official commitment to a ‘no first use (NFU)’ policy as a cornerstone of its nuclear doctrine has been maintained since the inception of its tactical weapons (TWs). However, over time, scholarly, military, and political circles in India have engaged in a growing debate concerning the potential reevaluation of this policy. Analysts specializing in nuclear issues contend that India’s nuclear posture reflects a sophisticated synthesis of deterrence concepts proposed by Sundarji and Subrahmanyam. These doctrines encompass a dual-use deterrence approach, incorporating defensive and offensive elements to effectively deter potential adversaries, particularly Pakistan and China. Nevertheless, it is essential to note that the contemporary orientation of India’s nuclear posture differs significantly from the immediate post-1998 nuclear events in South Asia, reflecting a nuanced evolution in its strategic and nuclear policy outlook.

Indian military strategies against Pakistan encompass three core objectives, which are central to their approach. Firstly, they involve executing border intrusions or what are often referred to as “illegal surgical strikes.” These operations aim to achieve specific military objectives within Pakistan’s territory, demonstrating India’s willingness to take decisive actions to safeguard its interests.

Secondly, India aims to mitigate the perceived threat level in illegally occupied Jammu & Kashmir while strategically framing the Kashmir freedom struggle as an act of terrorism. By portraying it in this light, India seeks to delegitimize the movement and concurrently discourage Pakistan’s support for any independence movements in the region. This tactic underscores India’s focus on weakening Pakistan’s backing for potential secessionist movements.

Thirdly, Indian military strategies involve an emphasis on clandestine operations and support to militant actors operating within Pakistan’s borders under the umbrella of Indian RAW. This clandestine assistance aims to undermine internal peace and security in Pakistan, creating a volatile environment that can be exploited to India’s advantage.

In the context of historical developments, India’s peaceful nuclear agenda initially received support through technology transfers from Western nations. However, India eventually misused this assistance to bolster its military capabilities. Over the past few years, India’s actions have repeatedly violated international norms and laws, as evidenced by its military misadventures. The sequence of offensive actions initiated by India indicates a deliberate strategy to provoke Pakistan. Simultaneously, the political leadership of India has been continuously issuing threatening statements against Pakistan, further fueling tensions and apprehensions in the region.

Recent statements by Rajnath Singh and other military high-ups in India, particularly regarding crossing the Line of Control (LoC) and launching attacks on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), provide confirmation of a discernible shift in India’s nuclear posture. Such statements signal a departure from India’s previous posture of restraint and indicate a willingness to adopt a more dangerous and potentially escalatory stance in its nuclear strategy. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) confirms that India is consistently increasing its horizontal and vertical nuclear capabilities. The new approach has multidimensional objectives and a comprehensive approach to deal with regional and global objectives.

As a matter of fact, the evolving Indian nuclear posture exhibits two significant tenets. Firstly, a discernible shift in priority is evident, wherein the emphasis has moved away from a defensive retaliation approach towards a proactive first attack strategy. Secondly, the Indian nuclear posture now seeks to integrate both counter-value and counterforce strategies. By combining these two approaches, India aims to not only target Pakistan’s military capabilities (counterforce), but also its valuable assets and population centers (counter value).

Indeed, India’s current offensive trajectory in its military and nuclear policy is leading the South Asian region towards a precarious and potentially risky situation, which could have broader global implications. As such, it is imperative for Pakistan to swiftly engage in diplomatic and political efforts aimed at exposing India’s intentions within the region. Timely and decisive engagements are vital to unmask India’s strategic objectives and garner international support in addressing the emerging challenges posed by India’s actions.

 

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Global Politico.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
VK
Telegram
WhatsApp
Email
Print
Tech and Power
Defense
Dr. Minhas Majeed Khan

Tech and Power: Shaping the Future of Global Security

Technological advancements, particularly AI and cyber capabilities, are revolutionizing global security by reshaping geopolitics and national strategies. While offering new tools for protection, technology also poses complex threats, necessitating international collaboration and responsible use to ensure global security and prosperity.

Read More »
Annexation-of-Hyderabad
Articles & Op-eds
Syed Inam Ali Naqvi

When Might Made Right? Indian Annexation of Junagadh, Hyderabad, and Kashmir

India’s 1947 annexation of Junagadh, Hyderabad, and Kashmir prioritized strategic interests over self-determination. Despite promises of plebiscites, India’s power allowed it to disregard democratic ideals, particularly in Muslim-majority Kashmir, where accession to Pakistan was favored. This selective application of principles reveals contradictions in India’s policies and highlights the lasting impact of power imbalances on the region’s fate.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Afghan policy
Conflicts
Aminah Gilani

Pakistan’s Afghan Policy: Reactionary Measures or Strategic Vision?

This piece explores Pakistan’s airstrikes inside Afghan territory in March 2024 and delves into Pakistan’s foreign policy decision-making model vis-a-vis Pakistan’s Afghan Policy in both confrontational and non-confrontational situations, particularly since the establishment of Taliban rule in Afghanistan.

Read More »
Iran-Israel Strikes, Iran-Israel Exchange of Military Strikes
Conflicts
Shamil Abdullah

Deconstructing the Iran-Israel Exchange of Military Strikes

Deconstructing the Iran-Israel Exchange of Military Strikes By Shamil Abdullah On April 13th, Iran launched an unprecedented strike on Israel with more than 300 drones, ballistic, and cruise missiles in the wake of Israel’s 1st April strike on the Iranian embassy complex in Damascus, Syria. The airstrike killed 16 people which included

Read More »
China’s Silence Over Red Sea Maritime Crisis
Conflicts
Behrawar Shahnawaz

Questioning China’s Silence Over Red Sea Maritime Crisis?

China’s staying silent on Houthi attacks in the Red Sea hurts global trade, especially for China itself. Despite its stake, China avoids military action and pressuring Iran to stop the Houthis. This inaction casts doubt on China’s power and its ability to address global security challenges.

Read More »
Post Views: 125